link : Why did Pakistan’s F-16s refuse to engage the IAF’s Mig-29s during the Kargil War?
Why did Pakistan’s F-16s refuse to engage the IAF’s Mig-29s during the Kargil War?
Source:-Why did Pakistan’s F-16s refuse to engage the IAF’s Mig-29s during the Kargil War?
With its powerful MiG-29s swatting away Pakistani F-16s, the Indian Air Force’s MiG-21, MiG-27 and Mirage-2000 jets were able to devastate Pakistani military positions with impunity during the 1999 conflict.
India was minutes away from bombing Pakistan on June 13, 1999 during the Kargil War. The Indian Air Force had deployed 16 jet fighters, mostly MiGs, for carrying out attacks deep into enemy territory.
Mig-29’s are air superiority fighters and are equipped/loaded for it while F-16’s are interceptors. Fundamentally different planes and interceptors don’t match well against air superiority fighters. Also, at the point in time, the India MiG’s were much better equipped and loaded for air confrontations when compared to the Pakstiani Airforce.
The IAF’s employment of airpower against Pakistan Army positions at Himalayan heights of 18,000 ft – unprecedented in the history of aerial warfare – achieved three key objectives: it ensured an early Indian victory, demoralised the Pakistani military and showed the limitations of nuclear deterrence.
Because of the aerial superiority achieved by the IAF in the war – and later during the 2002 border standoff – the Pakistan Air Force’s “psyche took a big beating”, says a Strategy Page report.
The Mig29s actually acted as a protective cover for other Indian fighters during Kargil war, dominating the airspace. The simple reason why F-16s could not engage the Mig 29s is that the Migs were equipped with Russian BVRAAMs (Beyond Visual Range missiles) of 80 km range, whereas the Pakistani F16s did not have BVR missiles at that time (Now the F16s are also equipped with BVRAAMs of 80 km range). While there were strict instructions for the IAF not to cross the LOC, the Migs could have been lethal to the Paki F16s even from within our territory.
The
As stated in US air manuals, “Air power produces physical and psychological shock by dominating the fourth dimension of time. Shock results in confusion and disorientation.” At the same time, the Indian Army was pounding away at the Pakistani positions with its heavy artillery. The continuous barrage of bombs exploding around them day and night had a devastating effect on the Pakistani intruders.
The effectiveness of the IAF’s operations can be measured by the fact that Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Sartaj Aziz, rushed to New Delhi on June 12, and implored India to “stop its air strikes”. You don’t get more desperate than that.
However, the most telling statement on the war was made by India’s then defence minister George Fernandes. In January 2000 he observed that in precipitating the Kargil War, Pakistan “had not absorbed the real meaning of nuclearisation – that it can deter only the use of nuclear weapons, but not conventional war.”
Source:- Quora
The post Why did Pakistan’s F-16s refuse to engage the IAF’s Mig-29s during the Kargil War? appeared first on Indian Defence Update.Indian Defence Update -
Please Visit Our Site For Latest News On Indian Army, Navy and Airforce Indian Defence Update.
from Indian Defence Update https://ift.tt/2JDmuFU
via IFTTT
thus Article Why did Pakistan’s F-16s refuse to engage the IAF’s Mig-29s during the Kargil War?
You now read the article Why did Pakistan’s F-16s refuse to engage the IAF’s Mig-29s during the Kargil War?with the link address https://uswordarmy.blogspot.com/2018/06/why-did-pakistans-f-16s-refuse-to.html
0 Response to "Why did Pakistan’s F-16s refuse to engage the IAF’s Mig-29s during the Kargil War?"
Post a Comment