Loading...

Should Britain's Security Chiefs Be Held Responsible For Failing To Prevent The Latest Terror Attacks In Britain?

Should Britain's Security Chiefs Be Held Responsible For Failing To Prevent The Latest Terror Attacks In Britain? - Hallo friend US WORD ARMY, In the article you read this time with the title Should Britain's Security Chiefs Be Held Responsible For Failing To Prevent The Latest Terror Attacks In Britain?, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Items AIR FORCE, Items ARMY, Items INTELLIGENCE, Items NAVY, Items SPECIAL FORCES, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Loading...
Title : Should Britain's Security Chiefs Be Held Responsible For Failing To Prevent The Latest Terror Attacks In Britain?
link : Should Britain's Security Chiefs Be Held Responsible For Failing To Prevent The Latest Terror Attacks In Britain?

see also


Should Britain's Security Chiefs Be Held Responsible For Failing To Prevent The Latest Terror Attacks In Britain?

Loading...

Con Couglin, The Telegraph: Britain's security chiefs must answer for their failure to prevent this wave of terrorism

No fair-minded person doubts the professionalism of the thousands of British intelligence, security and police officers battling to defeat Islamist terrorism. It is by dint of their efforts that, when other European capitals were suffering horrendous attacks, attempts to visit similar atrocities upon the streets of Britain were thwarted.

Theresa May says that counter-terrorism officials have disrupted 18 significant terror plots since 2013. And when Britain did come under attack, those on the front line displayed heroic courage. PC Keith Palmer lost his life trying to prevent Khalid Masood from causing carnage in the Palace of Westminster, and in last weekend’s London Bridge atrocity, a transport police officer suffered serious injury tackling three knife-wielding terrorists armed with just his standard issue baton.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: The above Telegraph commentary by Con Coughlin is behind a pay-wall. As to what is my take .... my understanding is that there are only a few thousand British counter-terrorism officers overseeing a file that includes over 20,000+ possible suspects/sympathisers/known Islamic radicals/etc.. In short .... Britain's security departments are overwhelmed. Should the security chiefs be blamed .... yes definitely .... but also the politicians and their policies who produced this mess in the first place .... and their complete failure (and I say cowardice) to present a plan/strategy/policy to the public on how to defeat it.

Hat tip Gabriel for this story.


thus Article Should Britain's Security Chiefs Be Held Responsible For Failing To Prevent The Latest Terror Attacks In Britain?

that is all articles Should Britain's Security Chiefs Be Held Responsible For Failing To Prevent The Latest Terror Attacks In Britain? This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article Should Britain's Security Chiefs Be Held Responsible For Failing To Prevent The Latest Terror Attacks In Britain?with the link address https://uswordarmy.blogspot.com/2017/06/should-britains-security-chiefs-be-held.html
Loading...

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "Should Britain's Security Chiefs Be Held Responsible For Failing To Prevent The Latest Terror Attacks In Britain?"

Post a Comment